Hi and greetings from passive follower :)

I think folks of mediaproxy project just recently discussed somewhat similar
scenario Juha is referring to, here is a link to discussion:
http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2011-January/016347.html

It is not exactly the same as there is no actual forked SIP branch, just
changing media source endpoint.

Is that leaky media case also handled correctly by SEMS (allthough no
parallel branch exist)?

-- 
Mikko
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev

Reply via email to