Hi,

o Carsten Bock on 11/18/2013 06:22 PM:
> Hi,
> 
> i have configured my SEMS to be a SBC only with only one Profile (as
> part of our Proxy-CSCF).
> 
> /etc/sems/sems.conf:
> [...]
> sip_ip=127.0.0.1
> sip_port=5080
> [...]
> application = sbc
> [...]
> 
> /etc/sems/etc/sbc.conf
> [...]
> active_profile=g711
> [...]
> 
> Since i wanted to do some tests with Transcoding between G711 and GSM,
> i've upgraded to latest master from GIT. I thought, SEMS-trunk would
> be a better choice for this...
> Now however, SEMS no longer replies to OPTIONS-Requests, even if they
> directed directly at SEMS itself. Kamailio will send out regular
have you tried using a map with the method, and doing sth like

active_profile=$M($m=>methodmap),default_profile

where methodmap.conf
OPTIONS=>refuse_with_200

and in refuse_with_200.sbcprofile.conf
refuse_with="200 OK"

We had this topic recently, not sure whether there's still a bug with
this, but afair the sbc module needs to configured this way, while
with other apps the default is to reply 200 if the r-uri is the server
address itself.

Stefan

> OPTIONS-Requests, to check if SEMS is alive:
> 
> U 2013/11/18 17:46:18.806913 109.239.57.200:5060 -> 127.0.0.1:5080
> OPTIONS sip:127.0.0.1:5080 SIP/2.0.
> [...]
> 
> But SEMS only applies the SBC-Profile to that OPTIONS-Request and
> sends it back to the Kamailio:
> 
> U 2013/11/18 17:46:18.807503 127.0.0.1:5080 -> 109.239.57.200:5060
> OPTIONS sip:127.0.0.1:5080 SIP/2.0.
> 
> Other things, i've noticed:
> - if i enable the "Shutdown mode" (sems-stats -c "set_shutdownmode
> 1"), the behaviour stays the same as described above
> - if i add a message-filter in the SBC-profile, e.g.:
> [...]
> message_filter=blacklist
> message_list=OPTIONS
> [...]
> the message filter is ignored... :-(
> 
> Thanks again,
> Carsten
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev

Reply via email to