Hi Victor, Victor Seva wrote on 06/16/2015 03:25 PM: >> diff --git a/pkg/deb/jessie/changelog b/pkg/deb/jessie/changelog >> index 40221b2..bdec4e0 100644 >> --- a/pkg/deb/jessie/changelog >> +++ b/pkg/deb/jessie/changelog >> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ >> +sems (1.6.0) stable; urgency=low >> + >> + * SEMS 1.6.0 release >> + >> + -- stefan <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:10:56 +0200 >> + >> sems (1.6.0~dev) unstable; urgency=medium >> >> * Devel version > > I've fixed this for all supported distributions on 1.6 branch and > re-tagged 1.6.0 in order to be able to produce the proper packages. > I've upgraded the changelog files on master too with 1.7.0~dev version too thanks!
what should the tag in the master branch be in your opinion? Till now we had it called 1.6-dev, so that the version of a build would look like this: "1.6-dev-1269-g0ebee91". Similarly I tagged this branch 1.7-dev. Is that the correct way to do it? Best Stefan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Semsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
