Dr J : CVP is another useful measurement........regardeless of your opinion 
which I do not agree 
What I do agree is that passive leg raising is  very helpfull, the most 
important is that one should use all the tools available 

Regards 

From my HTC Sensation 4G on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network

----- Reply message -----
De: "Jo Krewinkel" <[email protected]>
Para: <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
CC: <[email protected]>
Asunto: Betr.: Re: [Sepsis Groups] volume required
Fecha: vie., feb. 15, 2013 4:37 a. m.
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=* Antwoord gewenst Bij 
gelegenheid+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=* Why don't 
you use Passive Leg Rising to see if a patient is fluid responsive, easy to use 
without any complication of overfilling and we all know that CVP is not the 
right measurement to see if fluid works. 
So please stop using this as a measurement for fluid-responsiviness 
J Krewinkel 
RN ICU, circulation Practitioner 
Atrium MC Parkstad  
the Netherlands 


Met vriendelijke groet,J. KrewinkelCirculation PractitionerAtrium MC Parkstad 
[email protected] 
045-5767010 
>>> [email protected]<[email protected]> 2/12/2013 3:17 >>>Fluid 
>>> challenge is one of the most dificult things to do....sometimes you just 
>>> need 1 l of cristaloids on others you will use as much as 5 l.....as it was 
>>> mentioned above the clinical response is the goal....o others you will need 
>>> more tools like central venous pressure, svo2 Even measure the diameter of 
>>> inferior cava vein all these to estimate where are you standing.....Hope it 
>>> helpsJuan pataro mdinstituto argentino de riƱon y transplanteFrom my HTC 
>>> Sensation 4G on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network 
----- Reply message -----De: "Rich Levrault" <[email protected]>Para: 
"sandeep varma" <[email protected]>CC: 
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>Asunto: [Sepsis Groups] volume 
requiredFecha: dom., feb. 10, 2013 10:59 a. m. 
Fluid should be given until it fails to produce a clinically appropriate 
response. Pulmonary edema is sometimes a necessary evil. Sent from Rich's 
iPhone 
On Feb 9, 2013, at 1:15 AM, sandeep varma <[email protected]> wrote: 



hello all 
i have a query regarding fluid volume requirement in sepsis. often have seen 
blood pressure improvement after fluid bolus but only to see it fall back after 
few minutes. the postulated theory behind this was leakage of given fluid into 
interstitial causing intravascular depletion again. my concern is that how much 
of fluid can be given this way? will this lead on to pulmonary edema and 
interstitial edema without much helping in building up intra vascular volume 
and aiding in stabilizing blood pressure? 
sandeep varma 
thriuvananthapuram 
kerala 
india 

_______________________________________________Sepsisgroups mailing 
[email protected]http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

<<inline: noname>>

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to