Do people know if a "vital sign review" needs to include the actual listing of each of the vital signs? If the MD/NP/PA says "vital signs were reviewed" is that sufficient? The solution below to automatically pull all the VS in seems a good one. It is likely not possible with our system so I'm trying to think about alternatives.
thank you, Joseph Clement, MS, RN, CCNS Clinical Nurse Specialist San Francisco General Hospital ph: 415206-6174 pg: 415 327-0220 ________________________________________ From: Sepsisgroups <[email protected]> on behalf of Townsend, Sean, M.D. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:02 AM To: Cynthia Wells; Nelson, Kathy Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Clock and Fluids I wish to advise the group we have devised a fix for this problem that will be released in version 5.1 of the specs. This version is effective for discharges 7/2016. I will not detail the matter here, but it provides an earlier verification of 30ml/kg delivered in the algorithm. If that is failed, the measure is failed so one may not pass with under-resuscitating a patient. On Oct 8, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Townsend, Sean, M.D. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This question initially brought by Cynthia and now carried forward by Kathy has been eye opening and I am working to see how we may rectify the apparent dilemma. What I can say in the meantime is a) In the scenario below, and for the present set of specifications, the physician documented shock time would stand, unfortunately as the shock clock start time. (And that late documentation is probably not helpful either, putting earlier performed elements at being at risk of outside abstraction time limits.) b) While as individuals involved with abstraction of charts (or just voracious readers of dense measure material) you have caught a problem which is not obvious to providers – that if the full infusion of fluids has not occurred a shock clock start time cannot be determined (unless the LIP documents shock). It appears that patient would only qualify for severe sepsis start time and not the rest of the measure requirements in the present set of specifications. I would ask you to keep in mind though that clinicians are very unlikely to understand this and while it is being remedied, that ignorance is probably a good thing. In other words, a provider will know only that they are supposed to give 30 ml/kg of fluids, it is extraordinarily unlikely they will be aware that a “glitch” in the measure specification could permit them to willfully under-resuscitate a patient and pass the measure (for severe sepsis and never reach shock). My guess is that SEP-1 will still perform as intended – to get providers cognizant of giving the right amount of fluids. The inner workings of the measurement will remain blind to many of them allowing an opportunity to resolve this issue. c) There is a solution to this … we will figure out a way to remedy it. It will come in a future specification and can’t take effect likely for many months to come. Sean R. Townsend, M.D. Vice President of Quality & Safety California Pacific Medical Center 2330 Clay Street, #301 San Francisco, CA 94115 email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> office (415) 600-5770 fax (415) 600-1541 From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cynthia Wells Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 4:29 PM To: Nelson, Kathy Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Clock and Fluids I agree as well with the comments below. It is odd that if the patient doesn't have lactate >4 and no documentation of septic shock in the case where didn't order enough fluids the case would be excluded from 6 hour instead of outlier. The fluids and antibiotics are the major components of saving lives. Cindy Wells Sent from my iPhone On Oct 5, 2015, at 7:04 PM, Nelson, Kathy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: My understanding of the measure definition and guidelines brings me to similar answers to these questions: Questions: 1. The patient develops severe sepsis at 0300 and BP drops to 80/40 at 0600. 30ml/kg was given and completed at 0730. BP 60/40 at 0830. Is the presentation time 0830? YES (my thoughts: agree, YES, based on the septic shock criterion that there is persistent hypotension in the one hour following fluid administration) 2. If the presentation time is 0830, then we have already completed the 3 hour bundle prior to presentation and have until 1430 to complete the 6 hour bundle, correct? YES (my thoughts: agree, YES, ASSUMING you took an initial Lactate, obtained a blood culture, administered antibiotics in the 3 hours following severe sepsis presentation time) 3. What would presentation time be if the patient did not receive the full 30ml/kg? BP 80/40 0600, received 20ml/kg at 0730 and Levophed gtt was initiated at 0830 for BP 60/40. MD documents septic shock at 1500. Is the presentation time 0830 with the hypotension following fluids or 1500 when the MD documents septic shock since the full amount of fluids were not received to determine if the patient truly had persistent hypotension? MYUNDERSTANDING IS THAT BECAUSE 30 ML/KG WERE NOT GIVEN, YOU CANNOT USE PERSISITANT HYPOTENSION AS A CRITERIA AND SO DOCUMENTATION OF SEPTIC SHOCK WOULD BE REQUIRED. SO IN THIS INSTANCE, 1500 WOULD BE YOUR START TIME. (my thoughts: Please see QNET Q&A 150527-000044, which states: · If the physician places an order for the total volume it must be equivalent to at least 30 mL/kg. · The Crystalloid Fluid Administration data elements are looking for the correct volume being ordered and the date and time it is started. Whether or not the correct volume was given is not part of these data elements · The Persistent Hypotension data element however does require the full volume of 30 mL/kg be given. So, I agree that you would not be able to use the persistent hypotension criterion for determining septic shock time and would need to use the time the physician documented Septic Shock UNLESS the patient had a Lactate >4 (the alternative definition for shock) 4. The patient develops severe sepsis at 0300. Lactic acid 5.0 at 0600 (not hypotensive). 30ml/kg is completed at 0830. Is the presentation time 0600 or 0830? SHOCK START TIME WOULD BE 0600. (my thoughts: agree, patient meets criteria for shock at 0600 based upon the criteria = severe sepsis + Lactate >4). Kathy Nelson Manager, Public Data Center for Health Information Services Advocate Health Care 3075 Highland Parkway, Downers Grove, IL 60515 630.929.6782 (internal: 55-6782) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> -----Original Message----- From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Clement, Joseph (DPH) Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 12:44 PM To: Osburn, Jennifer R. Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Clock and Fluids Jennifer - I'm going to test out my knowledge and tell you what I feel pretty sure is correct but I'm eager to hear from others if I am wrong: Questions: 1. The patient develops severe sepsis at 0300 and BP drops to 80/40 at 0600. 30ml/kg was given and completed at 0730. BP 60/40 at 0830. Is the presentation time 0830? YES 2. If the presentation time is 0830, then we have already completed the 3 hour bundle prior to presentation and have until 1430 to complete the 6 hour bundle, correct? YES 3. What would presentation time be if the patient did not receive the full 30ml/kg? BP 80/40 0600, received 20ml/kg at 0730 and Levophed gtt was initiated at 0830 for BP 60/40. MD documents septic shock at 1500. Is the presentation time 0830 with the hypotension following fluids or 1500 when the MD documents septic shock since the full amount of fluids were not received to determine if the patient truly had persistent hypotension? MYUNDERSTANDING IS THAT BECAUSE 30 ML/KG WERE NOT GIVEN, YOU CANNOT USE PERSISITANT HYPOTENSION AS A CRITERIA AND SO DOCUMENTATION OF SEPTIC SHOCK WOULD BE REQUIRED. SO IN THIS INSTANCE, 1500 WOULD BE YOUR START TIME. 4. The patient develops severe sepsis at 0300. Lactic acid 5.0 at 0600 (not hypotensive). 30ml/kg is completed at 0830. Is the presentation time 0600 or 0830? SHOCK START TIME WOULD BE 0600. Joe Joseph Clement, MS, RN, CCNS Clinical Nurse Specialist San Francisco General Hospital ph: 415206-6174 pg: 415 327-0220 ________________________________________ From: Sepsisgroups <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Osburn, Jennifer R. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:46 AM To: 'Townsend, Sean, M.D.' Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Clock and Fluids I guess I am still confused on the shock clock. I was under the impression from the specification manual that we used the point at which the patient became hypotensive and/or lactic acid >4 as the septic shock presentation time. Questions: 1. The patient develops severe sepsis at 0300 and BP drops to 80/40 at 0600. 30ml/kg was given and completed at 0730. BP 60/40 at 0830. Is the presentation time 0830? 2. If the presentation time is 0830, then we have already completed the 3 hour bundle prior to presentation and have until 1430 to complete the 6 hour bundle, correct? 3. What would presentation time be if the patient did not receive the full 30ml/kg? BP 80/40 0600, received 20ml/kg at 0730 and Levophed gtt was initiated at 0830 for BP 60/40. MD documents septic shock at 1500. Is the presentation time 0830 with the hypotension following fluids or 1500 when the MD documents septic shock since the full amount of fluids were not received to determine if the patient truly had persistent hypotension? 4. The patient develops severe sepsis at 0300. Lactic acid 5.0 at 0600 (not hypotensive). 30ml/kg is completed at 0830. Is the presentation time 0600 or 0830? Thanks Jennifer Osburn, RN, BSN Quality and Accreditation St. Mary's Medical Center [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> -----Original Message----- From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Townsend, Sean, M.D. Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 12:12 PM To: Parker, Erin Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Clock and Fluids In your scenario the shock clock starts at 14:00. No "second" bolus is required (but you may want to give more fluids). SSC supports the CMS measure for US hospitals. We have not removed all references to triage time and other changes as we have yet to clear these changes with our European counterparts, but it's in the works. On Sep 25, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Parker, Erin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: Just when I think I have a handle on the shock clock, I still don’t think I completely understand. Question: For a pt with severe sepsis with hypotension: EX: hypotension at 1200 given 30ml/kg, fluids completed at 1300, MAP at 1400 was 55, is 1400 when shock clock starts, and do you complete another 30ml/kg bolus? Question: SSC stills has triage time for clock to being if in ED, is this correct? Erin K. Parker RN, BSN, ACM | Infection Control Genesys Regional Medical Center | One Genesys Parkway | Grand Blanc, MI 48439 Phone: 810.606.5093| Fax: 810-606-5495 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%3cmailto:[email protected]>> | www.genesys.org<http://www.genesys.org/<http://www.genesys.org%3chttp:/www.genesys.org/>> This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail (or the person responsible for delivering this document to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please respond to the individual sending the message and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. _______________________________________________ Sepsisgroups mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org _______________________________________________ Sepsisgroups mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org _______________________________________________ Sepsisgroups mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org _______________________________________________ Sepsisgroups mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
