I would simply provide the clinical advice that for a provider it's best 
thought of as the time that you first suspected severe sepsis or shock.  Give 
yourself 6 hours from that point.  You likely have much more time than that 
given that the shock click starts later than the severe sepsis clock, do they 
should be fine.

It simply requires then getting comfortable with saying, "I first suspected 
sepsis at 11:30.  I'll start the block then."  If they want a "real" time, 
that's probably not possible to ascertain in the clinical domain, it needs to 
be abstacted.

On Dec 14, 2015, at 11:27 AM, CARIANN M DAHLQUIST 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hello,
I am inquiring if other facilities are still facing the barriers of physicians 
and nurses actually knowing when presentation time starts? I am looking for any 
ideas that you may be utilizing to help aide in the understanding or 
identification of time zero.
Thank you greatly!
CariAnn

CariAnn Dahlquist RN
Quality Management
Altru Health System | Grand Forks, ND
701.780.5339 phone | 701.780.1942 fax | 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


>>> "Downs, Brenda - PHX" 
>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
>>> 11/18/2015 11:53 AM >>>
Per the spec manual - all elements need to meet within the 6 hours - so I would 
say yes, it needs to be mentioned again unfortunately - whether it makes sense 
or not...

Brenda ☺

Brenda Downs MSN, APRN, ACNS-BC
Cell: 480-720-6102
Program Director Clinical Performance Improvement – ICU Care



-----Original Message-----
From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Prabhakar, Brenda
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 9:08 AM
To: Cynthia Wells; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Severe Sepsis Time Zero and documentation of 
infection

Hello-
I am looking for an answer to the question below posed some time ago.  If an 
infectious source is documented on admission and a patient develops signs of 
severe sepsis more than 6hrs later, must infection be documented again to 
determine start time and to be included in the measure?  It makes sense that 
the infectious source is known, but for data abstraction, must it be documented 
again within 6 hrs?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Brenda Prabhakar RN BSN
Sepsis Steering Committee Co-Chair
Doylestown Hospital
Doylestown, PA

________________________________________
From: Sepsisgroups 
[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 on behalf of Cynthia Wells 
[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:48 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Severe Sepsis Time Zero

Hello,

If infection/suspect infection is already established however the patient does 
not meet criteria until 8 hours after documentation of infection (SIRS + Organ 
Dysfunction) do we have to tie in the infection documentation again within 6 
hours or is it already assumed since infection has been documented/confirmed 
before the vital signs/abnormal lab values.

For Example: Patient presents to ED with Fever 09:00 and Chest X-Ray shows 
Pneumonia subsequently documented by ED at 9:30 no other abnormal labs or 
vitals. 16:00 Fever Persists, HR elevated, Lab work shows 16:20 lactate = 2.1 
and progress note 21:00 with documented interventions for PN. Do we have to tie 
the infection documentation timing back into the evaluation or because Patient 
already noted to have PN by ED at 9:30 that counts as 1 of the three criterion 
and 16:20 = Time Zero. Or do we account for all three criterion and 21:00 is 
new time zero as all three criterion within 6 hours of each other.

Cindy

Cynthia Wells
Steward Health Care
Director of Clinical Performance Analytics
(508) 404-8647

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may contain 
privileged or copyright information, and are intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you 
are required to notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your 
system. You may not copy, distribute or use this email or the information 
contained in it for any purpose other than to notify the sender.

We do not guarantee that this material is free from viruses or any other 
defects although due care has been taken to minimize the risk.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except 
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Altru Health 
System.

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to