According to CMS, the entire 30 ml/kg need be infused within 3 hours of 
"recognition of severe sepsis with hypotension or lactic acid > 4, not within 3 
hours of start of fluids.  No wiggle room re Chf or renal failure.  We view 
this as a big problem as many of our patients have very poor EFs and severe 
renal disease.  Makes doing the right thing very difficult at times.  SFH is a 
cardiac specialty hospital.

Evan SORETT, MD, FCCP, FACP
Director of Critical Care & Medical Informatics
St. Francis Hospital
Roslyn, NY

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 25, 2016, at 4:01 PM, [email protected] 
> wrote:
> 
> Send Sepsisgroups mailing list submissions to
>    [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
> 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Sepsisgroups digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Repeat volume assessment and    tissue    perfusion    CMS
>      requirements (Belfi, Karen)
>   2. Crystalloid fluids (Belfi, Karen)
>   3. Re: Septic Shock Presentation Time (Belfi, Karen)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:16:29 -0500
> From: "Belfi, Karen" <[email protected]>
> To: "Wilson, Van" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Sullivan-Wright, Dawn M." <[email protected]>,
>    "Gieselman,    Morris" <[email protected]>,
>    "[email protected]"
>    <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Repeat volume assessment and    tissue
>    perfusion    CMS requirements
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> There is no time frame stated for the fluids. 
> There are currently no reasons in the guidelines for not infusing the full 30 
> mL/kg. CMS has said they may review this for the next guideline update but 
> for now they don't allow for a reason not to infuse. However, they said of 
> course to use clinical judgment and not to order fluids for someone for whom 
> it is clinically contraindicated. 
> 
> Karen Belfi, RN, MSN
> Quality Outcomes Coordinator
> Lankenau Medical Center
> 
> 
>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Wilson, Van <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> at what time does the IVF have to be started? it looks like within 3 hrs of 
>> presentation of septic shock, however part of the definition of septic shock 
>> is severe sepsis with persistant hypotension measured one hr after bolus...
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Sepsisgroups [[email protected]] on behalf 
>> of Patricia Posa [[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 7:49 PM
>> To: Murray, Theresa
>> Cc: [email protected]; Sullivan-Wright,       Dawn M.; 
>> Gieselman,     Morris
>> Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Repeat volume assessment and tissue perfusion   
>>    CMS requirements
>> 
>> Hi Theresa
>> 
>> The full 30ml/kg needs to be given. There are no exceptions per CMS 
>> guidelines
>> 
>> The reassessment can be done anytime after the fluid bolus is completed and 
>> 6 hours from time met criteria for septic shock
>> 
>> Pat
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Jan 13, 2016, at 1:09 PM, "Murray, Theresa" <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> At our shop we are talking about the volume resuscitation.  Does it have to 
>>> be the entire 30ml/kg, or can the clinician treat the hypotension with 
>>> volume to the point of normotension especially in a renal or CHF patent and 
>>> still get credit for the metric?     I have heard different responses.
>>> Thanks in advance for the info
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Theresa Murray RN, MSN, CCRN, CCNS
>>> Critical Care Clinical Nurse Specialist
>>> Community Health Network
>>> 1500 N. Ritter Ave
>>> Indianapolis Indiana 46219
>>> 1-317-355-4258 office
>>> 1-317-351-7860 fax
>>> 1-317-904-7212 pager
>>> 1-317-627-9350 Mobile
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> Cookeville Regional Medical Center
>>> 931-783-5035
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by 
>>> Mimecast.  For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sepsisgroups mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sepsisgroups mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail contains information that may be 
>>> privileged,  confidential and subject to legal restrictions and penalties 
>>> regarding its unauthorized disclosure or other use. You are prohibited from 
>>> copying, distributing or otherwise using this information if you are not 
>>> the intended recipient or the employee or agent to deliver to the intended 
>>> recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us 
>>> immediately by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and all attachments 
>>> from your system. Thank you.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sepsisgroups mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sepsisgroups mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------- Confidentiality Notice: The 
>> information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
>> information and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named 
>> in the address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
>> notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
>> information is strictly prohibited. If you received this information in 
>> error, please notify the sender and delete this information from your 
>> computer and retain no copies of any of this information.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sepsisgroups mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:50:14 -0500
> From: "Belfi, Karen" <[email protected]>
> To: "Penoyer, Daleen" <[email protected]>,
>    "[email protected]"
>    <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Crystalloid fluids
> Message-ID:
>    <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> What I believe they meant is that the physician must order what he or she 
> thinks is best. However, there is no way in the measure currently to allow 
> for this-there is no question asking for "reason for no crystalloid fluids" 
> or "reason for <30 mL/kg fluids". However, they may address this later.
> 
> Karen Belfi, RN, MSN
> Quality Outcomes Coordinator
> Lankenau Medical Center 
> 484-476-8092
> Pager: 5240
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Penoyer, Daleen
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 3:16 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 188, Issue 3
> 
> While we've been telling our team this re: volume replacement, I recently saw 
> a question answered on CMS re: this and while it supports that this volume is 
> always required, but the last sentence indicates that the physician's 
> judgment may come into their decision (Question #8) This may allow loopholes 
> in the measure.
> 
> 
> Daleen Aragon Penoyer, PhD, RN, CCRP, FCCM Director, Center for Nursing 
> Research Orlando Health myorlandohealth.com facebook.com/orlandohealth 
> youtube.com/orlandohealth [email protected]
> 1404 Kuhl Ave., MP 161
> Orlando, FL 32806
> tel: 321.841.5589
> fax: 321.841.3530
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 3:11 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 188, Issue 3
> 
> Send Sepsisgroups mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        
> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
> 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
> Contents of Sepsisgroups digest..."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:51:23 -0500
> From: "Belfi, Karen" <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
>    "[email protected]"
>    <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Septic Shock Presentation Time
> Message-ID:
>    <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> 10:47 would be septic shock time. It's the earliest time criteria is met.
> 
> Karen Belfi, RN, MSN
> Quality Outcomes Coordinator
> Lankenau Medical Center
> 484-476-8092
> Pager: 5240
> [cid:[email protected]]
> 
> From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 9:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Septic Shock Presentation Time
> 
> Clinical criteria for severe sepsis is met at 1002. Crystalloid bolus 
> completed at 1247. SBP=79 @ 1300. SBP=87 @1330.
> Initial lactic acid =4.0 resulted at 1126.
> ED physician note started at 1047 containing documentation of possible septic 
> shock.
> Would septic shock presentation time be 1047, 1126 or 1300?
> 
> Karen King, RN MSN
> Quality Management Core Measures Specialist, Lead
> Lakeview Regional Medical Center
> 95 Judge Tanner Boulevard
> Covington, LA  70433
> Office: (985) 867-4467
> Cell:  (985) 788-0585
> Fax: (985) 867-4263
> Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> This email and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or 
> confidential information and may be read or used only by the intended 
> recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of the email or any of its 
> attachments, please be advised that you have received this email in error and 
> that any use, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying 
> of this email or any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this email in error, please immediately purge it and all attachments 
> and notify the sender by reply email or contact the sender at the number 
> listed.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20160122/a71ee9b9/attachment.htm>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 40233 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL: 
> <http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20160122/a71ee9b9/attachment.png>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sepsisgroups mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 189, Issue 1
> ********************************************
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to