I actually had a very similar scenario; attached is the response I received 
from CMS. Hope this helps.

Diane

Diane Coolidge RN
Quality Review Specialist
Community Hospital Division,  Quality Assurance
Phone: 262-257-3419      Fax: 262-257-2620
E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin
Community Memorial Hospital
W180 N8085 Town Hall Road
Menomonee Falls, WI 53051
froedtert<http://www.froedterthealth.org/>.com

This document is a confidential peer review document that records the 
investigations, proceedings and evaluations of Froedtert Hospital and Medical 
College of Wisconsin for the purpose of reviewing or evaluating the quality of 
health care and services provided by Froedtert Hospital and Medical College of 
Wisconsin. Medical College of Wisconsin Medical Staff
This document may not be disclosed or released except as specifically provided 
in Section 146.38(3) of the Wisconsin Statutes.  The unauthorized disclosure or 
release of this document or the information contained in this document may 
result in civil liability pursuant to Section 146.38(4) of the Wisconsin 
Statutes



From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Charity Love
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:49 AM
To: Greg Stanford; Veronica Tarala
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 209, Issue 1

      Would like an opinion on a specific case.  I have a patient that came in 
through the ED and only fit criteria for sepsis, not severe in the ED and blood 
cultures were not taken prior to IV ABX administration.  This patient later 
became hypotensive on the floor, thus fitting the criteria for severe sepsis 
since two SIRS were present at this time.  Since blood cultures were not 
originally taken prior to ABX administration would this still be a fallout even 
if at the time the ABX were given the patient did not yet meet severe sepsis 
criteria?  If blood cultures are taken once we have the presentation of severe 
sepsis would this fit the measure even if it would be after the first dose of 
ABX was already given?
Would appreciate anyone’s input on this matter.
Thanks,

Charity Love, RN, CCRN
Sepsis Coordinator
Mount Sinai Medical Center-Infection Control
Office: (305) 674-2121 X54926
Pager: (305) 212-4041
Cell: (305) 785-4214

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Greg Stanford
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 2:20 PM
To: Veronica Tarala
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 209, Issue 1

Here you go.


On Jun 25, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Veronica Tarala 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Does anyone have access to an article that has the latest definition of sepsis?

On Jun 23, 2016, at 6:47 PM, Greg Stanford 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
No.  Coding should not be using a differential diagnosis.  It depends on how it 
is worded.  “Probable”, for example, will get coded.  “Possible” will not.  I 
have ED docs who will put everything but the kitchen sink into the differential 
because they think that will justify a higher level of billing.  They 
frequently have a template with a huge list of differentials.  And it does not 
meet criteria for source of infection.

Greg Stanford, MD
Medical Director
Clinical Documentation Improvement and Outcomes

1840 Amherst Street | Winchester, Va 22601
Phone: (540) 596 4999   Cell: 540 664 5736  | 
|[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

<image001.png>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is confidential, may be legally privileged, 
and for the intended recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying, forwarding 
and distribution by any means is strictly prohibited. If received in error, do 
not read but delete and e-mail confirmation to the sender.




I would like to understand how my peers are abstracting a particular issue. I 
have a question for the group…

If you have a patient in the EC and the physician lists as part of the 
differential diagnoses a UTI or PNA. Then the physician documents as his final 
EC diagnosis respiratory failure, COPD with exacerbation. Then let’s say the 
patient does have the clinical signs to support severe sepsis. (temp 102, Pulse 
124, Respiratory failure documented and placed on vent).

Do you count the differential diagnoses of UTI and PNA as a source of infection 
in this scenario?

Thanks,
Debra

Debra M. Cox, BSN, RN
STTI Member
Corporate Quality Specialist | Quality Services

<image001.png>

101 East Wood Street | Spartanburg, SC 29303
O: 864-560-2694 | c: 864-327-5731 | f: 864-560-7365
e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>| w: 
SpartanburgRegional.com<http://www.spartanburgregional.com/>

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, 
build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."         ~R. 
Buckminster Fuller





_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain CONFIDENTIAL or 
PRIVILEGED information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and immediately destroy all copies of the 
original message and all attachments.

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.
--- Begin Message ---

Recently you requested personal assistance from our on-line support center. 
Below is a summary of your request and our response.

If this issue is not resolved to your satisfaction, you may reopen it within 
the next 1095 days.

Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you.



To access your question from our support site, click 
here.<https://cms-ip.custhelp.com/app/account/questions/detail/i_id/296330>


 Subject
2Q16 Blood Culture collection

 Discussion Thread
 Response Via Email (Char Teed) 06/29/2016 11:27 AM
Diane,

For this measure:

Measures are designed to address appropriate care for the majority of cases. 
There may be unique situations in which care a physician feels is appropriate 
is not consistent with a measure's standardized guidelines. CMS is aware of 
this and does not expect all cases will meet the measure 100% of the time as 
there are instances where clinically appropriate care does not fall within the 
measure's standardized guidelines.

 Customer By Web Form (Diane Coolidge)  06/29/2016 11:12 AM
2Q16 Blood Culture collection:

I have a patient that was admitted for a total hip replacement. She was 
medically cleared and felt fine prior to the procedure. She received a pre-op 
prophylactic dose of Ancef prior to surgery. On the evening of the day of 
surgery she c/o chills and developed a fever. Sepsis d/t a UTI was suspected; 
criteria for severe sepsis were evident. The case has resulted in an 
opportunity for improvement because blood cultures were not collected prior to 
administration of the pre-op antibiotic. There was no need for blood cultures 
prior to the pre-op antibiotic.

The required criteria for severe sepsis management, including an initial 
lactate measurement, administration of a broad spectrum antibiotic, and blood 
cultures were collected prior to the dose of Zosyn that was administered after 
presentation of severe sepsis.

Could you please advise me as to how I should explain this fall out to the 
provider when clearly Best Practice was followed?

 Question Reference #160629-000047
Product Level 1:        Measures & Data Element Abstraction
Category Level 1:       Hospital Inpatient - Sepsis
Category Level 2:       Blood Culture Collection Date and Time
Date Created:   06/29/2016 11:12 AM
Last Updated:   06/29/2016 11:27 AM
Status:         Resolved (IP only)
Discharge Period:       10/01/2015 - 06/30/2016

[---001:001891:60732---]

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to