On Oct 18, 11:28 am, Jeremy Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > However, I'm pretty sure that breaks remove_ for many_to_many > associations. We can probably just remove the check for the object > already being associated in the many_to_many case, since that won't > negatively affect things. > > We should also add all relevant specs that we added for one_to_many > associations for many_to_many associations as well. While they > currently call the same internal methods, they should have separate > specs.
I've fixed these issues in a private branch. I'll be pushing tomorrow after running it through the full test suite. Jeremy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
