On May 4, 10:00 am, Jeremy Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > The patch looks fine, but the jdbc subadapter should probably be > refactored. The problem is both the sqlserver JDBC subadapter and the > jtds JDBC subadapter are the same, when they should really be > separate. That's going to require having a JDBC shared subadapter > that both of them require. I'll work on that and integrate this patch > into the jtds subadapter.
Committed: https://github.com/jeremyevans/sequel/commit/460a5f3ea0bb00e59b1cb5948500abb5f5ebcc4f Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
