No strong feelings either way; when I run Sequel tests I'm normally authoring a patch, which means I have the git repository anyways. I have to wonder how frequently the tests in the gem are being run tho.
That said, I can imagine the tests in something with a C extension (such as sequel_pg) being more valuable shipping inside the gem, as that's more frequently where I seem to run into edge cases. C extensions with Linuxism's not building on FreeBSD. Not directly applicable to sequel itself obviously, but might affect things since sequel_pg piggybacks on sequel tests. On Saturday, January 18, 2020 at 2:27:50 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > Sequel has always shipped tests in the gem, so that users and packagers > can test it without cloning the repository, but it does make the gem > significantly larger. I'm open to feedback on whether Sequel should > continue to do this, so if you feel strongly one way or the other, please > respond. > > Thanks, > Jeremy > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/e3822936-097d-464b-86da-5c88f7bc0c01%40googlegroups.com.
