On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:49 AM Billy Zheng <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, thank you. > > One more question, do you consider add support for `present?`, i wrote > code like this at the end of that file. >
No. The only reason the blank extension exists is for backwards compatibility. It was originally used for other internal features, but Sequel::Database#blank_object? is now used for that (this will call blank? on the object if the object responds to it, also for backwards compatibility). I don't want to add any new features to the blank extension. I also do not want to add any extensions that are general modifications to core classes and not specifically related to Sequel. The support for blank? was added before I took over maintenance. Thanks, Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/CADGZSSeysg1cP1%2BOj4nV0%3DAzZLwR9_ROyF7ZyGmtRV8F2a2x_A%40mail.gmail.com.
