hi alex, which group-coomunication protocoll are you using ? (jgroups, appia or spread) Do you want a dynamic group binding? That means if you start a third controller it will be added to the group automatically (if a matching virtual-database.xml is provided) Or do you want a static binding? That means you define a static group communication configuration, that refers to the controllers in the group.
Stefan Alex wrote: > I would like to have two controllers, on different machines, hosting a > single virtual database. So I've set up the two controllers, they are > both hosting a virtual database called MyDB with the same settings, > but they aren't "joined" - they don't know about each other. > > In other words, "show controllers" run on one of the controller > machines gives: > > myDB(admin) > show controllers > myDB is hosted by 1 controller(s): > 192.168.0.126:1090 > > and when I run that command on the other controller machine I get: > > myDB(admin) > show controllers > myDB is hosted by 1 controller(s): > 192.168.0.128:1090 > > What is the glue that tells them they're both hosting the same virtual > database? > The usual ports (25322, 1090) are open on both machines, so I don't > think it's a firewalling issue. > I think I saw something in the documents about there being a network > broadcast so that controllers could find each other, but can't locate > that now. > > thanks, > Alex > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sequoia mailing list > [email protected] > https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Sequoia mailing list [email protected] https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
