Nuland has tough time justifying US involvement in Ukraine

Published time: May 09, 2014 04:14 

Get short URL <http://rt.com/news/157808-nuland-grilled-ukraine-costs/>  

US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria 
Nuland.(AFP Photo / Nicholas Kamm) 

Download video 
<http://img.rt.com/files/news/26/87/00/00/ukraine-politics-nuland-grilled-0500_480p.mp4?event=download>
  (36.51 MB) 

While the Obama administration insists that supporting Ukrainian Presidential 
elections are vital to national interests, some members of the US political 
elite are questioning the costs of getting involved.

During a two hour House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing, the US Assistant 
Secretary of State Victoria Nuland shared her assessment 
<http://rt.com/news/157808-nuland-grilled-ukraine-costs/%20http:/docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA00/20140508/102206/HHRG-113-FA00-Wstate-NulandV-20140508.pdf>
  of the US role in Ukraine's crisis and the upcoming presidential election. 

But instantaneously she came under fire from Dana Rohrabacher, a republican 
congressman from California. 

“We did have legitimate election before, and the legitimate president was 
removed after we had major street violence. There were pictures of people 
running around that we were told were neo-Nazis,” Rohrabacher challenged 
Nuland. 

Nuland faced a hard time coming up with answers. 

“First of all the vast majority of those who were participating on Maidan were 
peaceful protesters. There were mothers and grandmothers and veterans,” Nuland 
said, but before being able to continue, Rohrabacher reminded the diplomat of 
vast presence of violent Ukrainian radicals. 

“I saw those pictures and I also saw a lot of people throwing fire bombs at 
groups of policemen. There were people shooting into the ranks of police. So, 
yes, there were mothers with flowers, but there were also very dangerous street 
fighters engaged in those demonstrations. The question is: were there neo-Nazi 
groups involved?” 

Nuland could not provide a definitive answer, saying that “there were many 
colors of Ukraine involved including very ugly colors.” 

For the record, Nuland submitted and read out a statement where she said that 
US policy towards Ukraine is based on four pillars. 

First of all Washington is offering “financial, technical and non-lethal 
security assistance” for the May 25 election. 

“In addition to $92 million in FY2013 State/USAID funds and $86 million in 
FY2014 funds, we are providing an additional $50 million in technical 
assistance and the $1 billion dollar loan guarantee under the authority passed 
by Congress on April 1st.” 

The US electoral assistance includes “$11 million for non-partisan election 
activities, including efforts to support voter education and civic 
participation” as well as participation as observers in the upcoming poll. 

“In addition to the 100 OSCE observers we are sending, the United States is 
supporting 255 long-term observers and over 3300 short-term observers,” Nuland 
said. 

Financial aid also involves “$18 million in non-lethal security assistance to 
the Ukrainian armed forces and State Border Guard Service to enable them to 
fulfill their core missions.” 

 

AFP Photo / Alex Wong

Secondly the US, Nuland outlined, is working with its international partners 
“to leave the door open for diplomatic de-escalation should Russia change 
course,” claiming that Kiev implemented the terms of the Geneva deal, while 
“Russia fulfilled none of its commitments.” 

Third, Washington is steadily increasing economic sanctions Russia’s which 
Nuland claims is bearing fruit. 

“The Russian economy ... is already buckling under the pressure of these 
internationally imposed sanctions. Its credit ratings are hovering just above 
junk status,” said Nuland. 

Not everyone agreed, with Ted Poe, a Texas Republican, saying many are not 
convinced that sanctions do indeed produce any effect. 

“I don't think it's worked,” he said. “In all fairness, I don't think it's 
stopped Russia from doing anything.” 

Meanwhile, Nuland stated that the last step US is taking in regards to Ukraine 
is reassuring its NATO allies of US commitment as well as “providing support to 
other frontline states like Moldova and Georgia.” 

“We have worked with our NATO Allies to provide visible reassurance—on land, 
sea and in the air—that Article 5 of the NATO Treaty means what it says.” 

In the meantime, the only tangible proposals on resolving the Ukrainian crisis 
reached by President Putin and OSCE Chairperson-in-Office and Swiss President 
Didier Burkhalter during negotiations in Moscow on Wednesday, were ignored by 
the government in Kiev. 

Rejecting the OSCE roadmap, Kiev has put forward its own vague plan of 
organising “national unity roundtables” with “representatives of all political 
forces from all regions and civil society.” At the same time Kiev pledged 
<http://rt.com/news/157696-kiev-reaction-osce-russia/>  regardless of other 
developments to continue its “anti-terrorist operation” against southeastern 
Ukraine, which the Russian foreign ministry says bluntly contradicts the 
agreement reached in Geneva. 

http://rt.com/news/157808-nuland-grilled-ukraine-costs/

Reply via email to