http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/07/19/happened-malaysian-airliner-paul-craig-roberts/

______________________________________________

What Happened to the Malaysian Airliner?
-- Paul Craig Roberts - PaulCraigRoberts.org 
______________________________________________

July 19, 2014

Washington’s propaganda machine is in such high gear that we are in danger of 
losing the facts that we do have.

One fact is that the separatists do not have the expensive Buk anti-aircraft 
missile system or the trained personnel to operate it.

Another fact is that the separatists have no incentive to shoot down an 
airliner and neither does Russia. Anyone can tell the difference between 
low-flying attack aircraft and an airliner at 33,000 feet.

The Ukrainians do have Buk anti-aircraft missile systems, and a Buk battery was 
operational in the region and deployed at a site from which it could have fired 
a missile at the airliner.

Just as the separatists and the Russian government have no incentive to shoot 
down an airliner, neither does the Ukrainian government nor, one would think, 
even the crazed extreme Ukrainian nationalists who have formed militias to take 
the fight against the separatists that the Ukrainian army is not keen to 
undertake–unless there was a plan to frame Russia.

One Russian general familiar with the weapon system offered his opinion that it 
was a mistake made by the Ukrainian military untrained in the weapon’s use. The 
general said that although Ukraine has a few of the weapons, Ukrainians have 
had no training in their use in the 23 years since Ukraine separated from 
Russia. The general thinks it was an accident due to incompetence.

This explanation makes a certain amount of sense and far more sense than 
Washington’s propaganda. The problem with the general’s explanation is that it 
does not explain why the Buk anti-aircraft missile system was deployed near or 
in a separatist territory. The separatists have no aircraft. It seems odd for 
Ukraine to have an expensive missile system in an area in which it is of no 
military use and where the position could be overrun and captured by 
separatists.

As Washington, Kiev, and the presstitute media are committed to the propaganda 
that Putin did it, we are not going to get any reliable information from the US 
media. We will have to figure it out for ourselves.

One way to begin is to ask: Why was the missile system where it was? Why risk 
an expensive missile system by deploying it in a conflict environment in which 
it is of no use? Incompetence is one answer, and another is that the missile 
system did have an intended use.

What intended use? News reports and circumstantial evidence provide two 
answers. One is that the ultra-nationalist extremists intended to bring down 
Putin’s presidential airliner and confused the Malaysian airliner with the 
Russian airliner.

The Interfax news agency citing anonymous sources, apparently air traffic 
controllers, reported that the Malaysian airliner and Putin’s airliner were 
traveling almost the identical route within a few minutes of one another. 
Interfax quotes its source: “I can say that Putin’s plane and the Malaysian 
Boeing intersected at the same point and the same echelon. That was close to 
Warsaw on 330-m echelon at the height of 10,100 meters. The presidential jet 
was there at 16:21 Moscow time and the Malaysian aircraft at 15:44 Moscow time. 
The contours of the aircrafts are similar, linear dimensions are also very 
similar, as for the coloring, at a quite remote distance they are almost 
identical.”

I have not seen an official Russian denial, but according to news reports, the 
Russian government in response to the Interfax news report said that Putin’s 
presidential plane no longer flies the Ukraine route since the outbreak of 
hostilities.

Before we take the denial at face value, we need to be aware that the 
implication that Ukraine attempted to assassinate the president of Russia 
implies war, which Russia wants to avoid. It also implies Washington’s 
complicity as it is highly unlikely that Washington’s puppet in Kiev would risk 
such a dangerous act without Washington’s backing. The Russian government, 
being intelligent and rational, would obviously deny reports of an attempted 
assassination of the Russian president by Washington and its Kiev puppet. 
Otherwise, Russia has to do something about it, and that means war.

The second explanation is that the extremists who operate outside the official 
Ukrainian military, hatched a plot to down an airliner in order to cast the 
blame on Russia. If such a plot occurred, it likely originated with the CIA or 
some operative arm of Washington and was intended to force the EU to cease 
resisting Washington’s sanctions against Russia and to break off Europe’s 
valuable economic relationships with Russia. Washington is frustrated that its 
sanctions are unilateral, unsupported by its NATO puppets or any other 
countries in the world except possibly the lap-dog British PM.

There is considerable circumstantial evidence in support of this second 
explanation. There is the youtube video which purports to be a conversation 
between a Russian general and separatists who are discussing having mistakenly 
brought down a civilian airliner. According to reports, expert examination of 
the code in the video reveal that it was made the day before the airliner was 
hit.

Another problem with the video is that whereas we could say that separatists 
conceivably could confuse an airliner at 33,000 feet with a military attack 
plane, the Russian military would not. The only conclusion is that by involving 
the Russian military, the video doubly discredited itself.

The circumstantial evidence easiest for non-technical people to understand is 
the on cue news programs organized to put the blame on Russia prior to the 
knowledge of any facts.

In my previous article 
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/07/17/sanctions-airliners-paul-craig-roberts/
 I reported on the BBC news report which I heard and which was obviously primed 
to place all blame on Russia. The program ended with a BBC correspondent 
breathlessly reporting that he has just seen the youtube video and that the 
video is the smoking gun that proved Russia did it. There is no longer any 
doubt, he said. Somehow the information got on a video and on youtube before it 
reached the Ukrainian government or Washington.

The evidence that Putin did it is a video made prior to the attack on the 
airliner. The entire BBC report aired over National Public Radio was 
orchestrated for the sole purpose of establishing prior to any evidence that 
Russia was responsible.

Indeed the entire Western media spoke as one: Russia did it. And the 
presstitutes are still speaking the same way.

Possibly, this uniform opinion merely reflects the pavlovian training of the 
Western media to automatically line up with Washington. No media source wants 
to be subject to criticism for being unamerican or to find itself isolated by 
majority opinion, which carries the day, and earn black marks for being wrong. 
As a former journalist for, and contributor to, America’s most important news 
publications, I know how this works.

On the other hand, if we discount the pavlovian conditioning, the only 
conclusion is that the entire news cycle pertaining to the downing of the 
Malaysian airliner is orchestrated in order to lay the blame on Putin.

Romesh Ratnesar, deputy editor of Bloomberg Businessweek, provides convincing 
evidence for orchestration in his own remarks of July 17. 
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-07-17/the-malaysia-airlines-shootdown-spells-disaster-for-putin?campaign_id=DN071814
 Ratnesar’s opinion title is: “The Malaysia Airlines Shootdown Spells Disaster 
for Putin.” Ratnesar does not mean that Putin is being framed-up. He means that 
prior to Putin having the Malaysian airliner shot down, “to the vast majority 
of Americans, Russia’s meddling in Ukraine has largely seemed of peripheral 
importance to U.S. interests. That calculus has changed. . . . It may take 
months, even years, but Putin’s recklessness is bound to catch up to him. When 
it does, the downing of MH 17 may be seen as the beginning of his undoing.”

As a former Wall Street Journal editor, anyone who handed me a piece of shit 
like Ratnesar published would have been fired. Look at the insinuations when 
there is no evidence to support them. Look at the lie that Washington’s coup is 
“Russia’s meddling in Ukraine.” What we are witnessing is the total corruption 
of Western journalism by Washington’s imperial agenda. Journalists have to get 
on board with the lies or get run over.

Look around for still honest journalists. Who are they? Glenn Greenwald, who is 
under constant attack by his fellow journalists, all of whom are whores. Who 
else can you think of? Julian Assange, locked away in the Ecuadoran Embassy in 
London on Washington’s orders. The British puppet government won’t permit free 
transit to Assange to take up his asylum in Ecuador. The last country that did 
this was the Soviet Union, which required its Hungarian puppet to keep Cardinal 
Mindszenty interred in the US Embassy in Budapest for 15 years from 1956 until 
1971. Mindszenty was granted political asylum by the United States, but 
Hungary, on Soviet orders, would not honor his asylum, just as Washington’s 
British puppet, on Washington’s orders, will not honor Assange’s asylum.

If we are honest and have the strength to face reality, we will realize that 
the Soviet Union did not collapse. It simply moved, along with Mao and Pol Pot, 
to Washington and London.

The flaw in Putin’s diplomacy is that Putin’s diplomacy relies on good will and 
on truth prevailing. However, the West has no good will, and Washington is not 
interested in truth prevailing but in Washington prevailing. What Putin 
confronts is not reasonable “partners,” but a propaganda ministry aimed at him.

I understand Putin’s strategy, which contrasts Russian reasonableness with 
Washington’s threats, but it is a risky bet. Europe has long been a part of 
Washington, and there are no Europeans in power who have the vision needed to 
separate Europe from Washington. Moreover, European leaders are paid large sums 
of money to serve Washington. One year out of office and Tony Blair was worth 
$50 million dollars.

After the disasters that Europeans have experienced, it is unlikely that 
European leaders think of anything other than a comfortable existence for 
themselves. That existence is best obtained by serving Washington. As the 
successful extortion of Greece by banks proves, European people are powerless.

Here is the official statement of the Russian Defense Ministry: 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/mh-17-crash-in-ukraine-official-statement-from-russian-defense-ministry/5392000

Washington’s propaganda assault against Russia is a double tragedy, because it 
has diverted attention from Israel’s latest atrocity against the Palestinians 
locked up in the Gaza Ghetto. Israel claims that its air attack and invasion of 
Gaza is merely Israel’s attempt to find and close the alleged tunnels through 
which Palestinian terrorists pour into Israel inflicting carnage. Of course 
there are no tunnels and no terrorist carnage in Israel.

One might think that at least one journalist somewhere in the American media 
would ask why bombing hospitals and civilian housing closes underground tunnels 
into Israel. But that is too much to ask of the whores that comprise the US 
media.

Expect even less from the US Congress. Both the House and Senate have passed 
resolutions supporting Israel’s slaughter of Palestinians. Two Republicans–the 
despicable Lindsey Graham and the disappointing Rand Paul–and two democrats–Bob 
Menendez and Ben Cardin–sponsored the Senate resolution backing Israel’s 
premeditated murder of Palestinian women and children. The resolution passed 
the “exceptional and indispensable” people’s Senate unanimously.

As a reward for its policy of genocide, the Obama regime is immediately 
transferring $429 million of US taxpayers’ money to Israel to pay for the 
slaughter.

Contrast the US government’s support for Israel’s war crimes with the 
propaganda onslaught against Russia based on lies. We are living all over again 
“Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction,” “Assad’s use of chemical 
weapons,” “Iranian nukes.”

Washington has lied for so long that it can’t do anything else

Reply via email to