Is it Islam or Uslam, ISIS or USIS, Al Qaeda or Al CIADA?

20.03.2015 

 

 

By Hans Vogel

It has never been a secret that  
<http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/06-12-2012/123040-al_qaeda_usa-0/> Al 
Qaeda was founded and funded by US spy agencies to give the Soviets a hard time 
after they had invaded Afghanistan in 1979. The ties between the US and Al 
Qaeda have never been severed, as the public is being made to believe. On the 
contrary, according to a recent New York Times article, millions of US dollars 
were given to Al Qaeda not long ago. In other words, the Washington regime is 
still funding Al Qaeda as it has been doing all along, all these past three 
decades and a half. To put it bluntly, Al Qaeda is a mere front organization 
following orders from Washington.

  

What goes for Al Qaeda, essentially goes for ISIS as well. While the public is 
made to believe the US and its NATO vassals are fighting ISIS, the reality is 
different. The bands of thugs that are turning Mesopotamia into a wasteland of 
horror and terror, (under the aegis of ISIS) are allowed to move about freely. 
Their equipment is new in perfect order. Yet how can it be, when ISIS is 
operating in a landlocked area, surrounded by longtime faithful US proxies? And 
of course, by Iran, but the Sunnite ISIS thugs are certainly no friends of the 
Shiite Iranians, perish the thought! If the Washington regime were at all 
serious about opposing ISIS, do you think it would permit Turkey, Saudi Arabia, 
the Gulf States and Israel to provide (as they have been doing systematically 
since ISIS first appeared on stage) extensive logistical and financial support 
to ISIS? It is because ISIS (or should we say "ISUS" or "USIS"), like Al Qaeda 
is a mere front organization following orders from Washington.

The orange overalls in which ISIS captives are dressed, are the same as those 
used for the inmates at the US concentration camp in Guantánamo Bay. ISIS has 
been recruiting thousands of young Muslims from US NATO vassals that are 
allowed unhindered access to ISIS-controlled territory. How do you think this 
could be possible without the full cooperation of all concerned European spy 
agencies, all marching in lockstep with their  
<http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/06-07-2012/121582-wikileaks_assange-0/> 
CIA puppet masters? The most telltale giveaway is, of course the absolute 
silence of the Israeli government. While constantly shouting angrily at distant 
Iran, the Israelis do not seem to be worried by the presence at their very 
doorstep of ISIS.

          

Of course, any well-informed thinking person would have concluded long ago that 
all talk of the danger of Islam is wildly exaggerated. If Islam is really such 
a danger, as all "Western" governments have been trying to make us believe, 
then why on earth did the US and its NATO vassals actively promote the creation 
of two new Islamic states in Europe? Because that is precisely what they did: 
first Bosnia Herzegovina and then Kosovo, after first performing the required 
"ethnic cleansing". Kosovo is a true rogue state, run by a small clique of 
ruthless criminals enriching themselves by means of drug trafficking, white 
slavery and the smuggling of organs for transplantations. Kosovo is a lot like 
Honduras, but whereas Honduras is a traditional banana republic,  
<http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/17-02-2009/107116-kosovo_independence-0/>
 Kosovo is a banana republic on steroids, a "drug republic". And precisely in 
Kosovo the Washington has located its most important military base: Camp 
Bondsteel, housing 7.000 US soldiers living behind a 2.5 meter high earthen 
wall.

Is it not strange that while the US and its NATO vassals keep telling us all 
about the threat and dangers of Islam, and keep reminding us not to trust 
Muslims, they are secretly supporting Islamist thugs in every imaginable way? 
Public opinion in the "West" is being exposed to a vicious little game 
conceived by a handful of evil idiots somewhere in or near Washington.

On the one hand, fear of anything pertaining to Islam and its adherents is 
being instilled on a daily basis, by governments and the government-controlled 
press. On the other hand,  
<http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/03-02-2012/120408-muslim_europe-0/> 
Muslims all over Europe are the beneficiaries of "positive discrimination" and 
are being pampered in every imaginable way. It comes as no surprise that many 
people are upset about this. But whenever average citizens express themselves a 
bit too outspokenly against Muslims, they are dragged before some kangaroo 
court (basically, all courts in the "West" have become mere kangaroo courts) to 
be convicted of "hate speech" or worse.

Meanwhile the  
<http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/28-04-2006/79653-washingtonregime-0/>
 Washington regime is busy doing everything in its power to destroy Europe, or 
at least prevent Europe from forming an alliance with Russia. As long as this 
remains a possibility, no matter how remote, the Washington regime cannot 
consolidate its stranglehold on the world. And that is where the Islam (or 
should we say "USlam"?) comes in: there is no more useful tool for the US to 
realize its objective.

Mind you, I am not the only one to say this, nor the first: I can heartily 
recommend the writings of Alexandre del Valle, for instance Guerres contre 
l'Europe (2000) and Islamisme et États-Unis: une alliance contre l'Europe 
(1997).

One cannot reiterate often enough: the US is NOT Europe's friend. Nor is it a 
friend of any individual European state. First of all because US people have a 
different concept of friendship than Europeans. For the latter, friendship, by 
its very nature, implies a relationship between equals: it is the very 
friendship that makes them equal. For a US-person, a relationship with a 
non-US-person, especially in the world of business or politics, can never be a 
relationship between equals, because he will always regard the other as 
inferior. Second. It is good to bear in mind a dictum of Charles de Gaulle: 
"France has no friends, it has only interests". Likewise, Europe has no friends 
(certainly not the US), it has only interests. Indeed, nations cannot have 
other nations as friends, they have only interests. And it is not in Europe's 
interest to have a close relationship with the US.

Hans Vogel

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/20-03-2015/130077-islam_uslam-0/

-- 



Reply via email to