Published on Russia Insider News (http://russia-insider.com)

Home <http://russia-insider.com/en>  > Canada's Political Mainstream United in 
Backing War in Ukraine

  _____  

Canada's Political Mainstream United in Backing War in Ukraine 

Marko Marjanovic 
Wed, Apr 1 | 

 

Canadians will go to the polls next October in the first national election 
since the Conservative Party won a majority government in 2011. There is 
intense concern among progressive people in the country about the prospects of 
the Conservatives winning another term in office.

The government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper is moving further and further 
to the right. It has aligned itself tightly with U.S. foreign policy, including 
being 'holier than thou' in its unconditional support of Israel. It joined the 
U.S.-led air war in Iraq six months ago and now it is joining the U.S. in 
expanding that to Syria. It has cemented Canada's role as a leading climate 
vandal in the world. It has attacked civil and social rights across the board 
and is now deepening that attack with the proposed, 'police-state Canada' Bill 
C-51.

This leaves many Canadians favorable to the idea of an electoral and governing 
alliance between the two, large opposition parties in Parliament—the Liberal 
and New Democratic parties—in order to defeat the Conservatives. NDP leader Tom 
Mulcair says 
<http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2015/03/18/ndp-leader-tom-mulcair-remains-open-to-liberal-alliance-to-knock-out-tories.html>
  he is open to a governing coalition with the Liberals if neither party wins 
an electoral majority.

But on the increasingly dangerous issue in world politics—the war in eastern 
Ukraine and accompanying military threats and expansion of NATO in eastern 
Europe—there is an astonishing unanimity in the Canadian political and media 
establishment. NATO is embarked on a drive to weaken Russia, with all the risk 
and folly which that entails—including a nuclear danger. The people and 
territory of Ukraine are being used as war proxies to get at Russia. Yet, there 
is nary a peep of disagreement in the Parliament in Ottawa.

Liberals in lock-step with Conservatives over Ukraine/Russia

Is it possible for opposition parties in Ottawa to promise big change from 
Conservative rule when they share the Conservative--and NATO--ambition for a 
'long war' with Russia? It is not. Canadians are seriously mistaken if we 
believe that a country embarked on confrontation with the peoples of Russia and 
elsewhere in eastern Europe can simultaneously tackle the important issues of 
our times such as climate change, political rights and social justice 
(particularly as concerns Indigenous peoples).

The website  <http://newcoldwar.org/> The New Cold War: Ukraine and beyond is 
writing and publishing extensively about the 'blame Russia' group think in 
government and mainstream media in Canada and other NATO countries over the war 
in Ukraine. With few exceptions, mainstream media in the NATO countries is 
acting as an echo chamber of government policy. The 'blame Russia' narrative 
says that the governing coalition in Ukraine of billionaire neo-conservatives 
and right-wing extremists are brave defenders of Ukraine worthy of support 
against 'Russian aggression', end of discussion.

It gets worse in Canada. Two of the country's leading newspapers—the Toronto 
Star and the Globe and Mail—have been publishing articles promoting the 
fundraising efforts in Canada of Ukraine's extreme-right paramilitaries for the 
purchase of weapons and other military equipment.

The Liberal Party, supposedly a party of the mainstream center, is proving 
every bit as hawkish and warlike as the Conservatives. A key voice of the party 
on Ukraine and Russia is Chrystia Freeland. She is an author, former editor of 
the Globe and Mail, and the star candidate of the Liberals who won the hotly 
contested by-election race in 2013 for the Parliamentary seat of Toronto Centre 
, narrowly defeating the candidate of the NDP, Linda McQuaig, a left-wing  
journalist.

One of Freeland's parents was Ukrainian and she is fluent in the language. 
Paradoxically, she is outspoken against the widening income gaps in the 
wealthiest countries of the world. She authored a book in 2012 titled, 
'Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich'.

Freeland spoke bluntly to a gathering of Ukrainian Canadian women on March 8 at 
an event in Toronto marking International Womens Day. A brief portion of her 
remarks (in English) was broadcast in a Ukrainian language news program  here 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rfho9Y1YH3Y>  (at the 7' mark).

She told the gathering, "This conflict with Russia is not going to end in one 
day. Our community, our country, the entire Western world needs to really be 
prepared for a new environment. This is not something that can end quickly, and 
we need to adjust the way we think. We need to understand this is a very 
profound ideological battle going on.

She went on, "It's actually a conflict even bigger than Ukraine. This is about 
the rule of law and democracy in Europe and the Western world. That's why it is 
being fought so fiercely."

She gave an interview to a Ukrainian-Canadian publication at the same event in 
which she said 
<http://newpathway.ca/canadian-politicians-on-what-the-west-is-doing-and-could-do-more-to-help-ukraine/>
 , "Having said that [the West has been valiantly aiding Ukraine], I think we 
need to be prepared that right now this Minsk-2 [ceasefire] moment is a pause, 
not the end. And we need to be prepared for this conflict to be a very, very 
long conflict."

Yvan Baker, the Liberal member for Etobicoke Center (Toronto) in the Ontario 
Legislature (an electoral district with a large number of Ukrainian-Canadians), 
is another of the Liberal hawks on Ukraine. He gave a statement to the 
Legislature 
<http://newpathway.ca/one-of-the-few-official-canadian-voices-openly-calling-for-weapons-supply-for-ukraine/>
  on March 11 in which he said, “Today, Ukraine is at war and the situation is 
dire. Russian-backed forces have occupied part of Eastern Ukraine and continue 
to advance. The soldiers I met [while visiting Ukraine in November 2014] are 
fighting against state-of-the-art equipment with outdated weapons, some from 
World War II."

"The invasion is a global threat. It is a violation of international law and 
order established at such great cost during WWII."

"Efforts at peace have failed. For months, Ukraine’s president has been asking 
for defensive [sic] weapons so that his nation stands a chance against the 
larger and more advanced Russian military. Others such as [U.S. Senator] John 
McCain and John Boehner [Republican Speaker of the U.S. House of 
Representatives] have echoed his call and the U.S. Congress has passed 
authorization for the U.S. to arm Ukraine.

"I urge our federal government to act on the Ukrainian Canadian Congress’s Feb. 
21st statement which calls for Canada to, and I quote: ‘dramatically increase 
sectoral sanctions’, ‘increase the provision of communications and intelligence 
capabilities’ and ‘provide Ukraine with the defensive weapons, equipment and 
training it needs to defend its territorial integrity’."

Liberal Party Premier of Ontario Kathleen Wynne joined the pro-war chorus last 
August when she appeared at a Ukraine Independence Day event in Toronto. It was 
organized by the extremist Ukrainian Canadian Congress and it featured a 
fundraising booth of the fascist Right Sector party of Ukraine. Funds were 
directed to the purchase of military equipment.

Wynne's speech was a vigorous call to continue Kyiv's war in eastern Ukraine. 
At the time, the war was at one of its bloodiest stages. Rockets and mortars 
were raining down relentlessly on civilian targets, including school and 
hospitals, while residents, including children, were living months on end in 
makeshift bomb shelters.

Wynne told the gathering that Ukraine armed forces "are defending the very 
independence that we are here to commemorate". She declined to speak to 
journalists afterward.

It is unusual, to say the least, for a provincial premier in Canada to 
pronounce vigorously on a foreign policy issue, particularly so when it 
concerns a brutal war against a civilian population. But such is the 
group-think support for Kyiv's war that Wynne's call to arms raised little 
attention or controversy.

The official opposition party, the NDP, has not been as vigorously outspoken as 
the Liberals (excepting an appearance by MP Peggy Nash at an event in Toronto 
last November where she shared a stage with a Right Sector guest speaker). But 
it supports the government/NATO drive.

All three large parties in Parliament joined in formally welcoming a visit 
<http://www.ucc.ca/2015/02/28/ukraines-deputy-speaker-concludes-visit-to-canada/>
  by Andriy Parubiy to Parliament on February 24-26. Parubiy was a founder of 
Ukraine's post-independence, fascist and extreme-right political movement in 
the early 1990s. He was the 'commander' of the right-wing shock troops on 
Maidan Square in Kyiv which spearheaded the overthrow of Ukraine's elected 
president in February 2014. His role has drawn attention because of revelations 
<http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-31359021>  that at least some of the sniper 
killings on Maidan Square on Feb. 20 were conducted from buildings occupied by 
the shock troops.[1] He became deputy speaker to Ukraine's Parliament following 
the election last Oct. 26.

The one Green Party member in Parliament has been in lock-step on Ukraine, 
notwithstanding her divergence from the government on the bombings in Iraq and 
on civil liberties issues. Elizabeth May put an innocuous question to the 
government in the House of Commons on March 25 in which she assured, "We all 
join the Prime Minister in condemning Putin's aggression [sic]…"

Police-state laws

Ironically, the opposition parties in Ottawa are voicing discomfort and even 
some opposition to a new set of police-state laws in Canada which resemble an 
awful lot those which have come into force in Ukraine during the past year. 
Bill C-51 contains several new "national security" provisions which will make 
it easier for Canada's political police and other police agencies to spy on, 
disrupt and pre-emptively arrest people deemed to be a threat to vaguely denied 
"national interests" and "national security" in Canada. The bill has been 
condemned by human rights lawyers and advocates, environmentalists and trade 
union leaders, among many others, who say its provisions are aimed squarely at 
critics of government and industry such as them. (See a full explanation of 
Bill C-51 here 
<http://rogerannis.com/thousands-across-canada-protest-police-state-bill-c-51/> 
.)

Indeed, the political policing to which Bill C-51 gives further legitimacy has 
been on full display in the streets of Montreal and Quebec City in the past ten 
days as tens of thousands of post-secondary students have gone on strike in 
Quebec against hikes to tuition fees and other antisocial, austerity policies. 
Last week, police in Montreal and Quebec City assaulted several large student 
demonstrations and arrested hundreds. In Quebec City on March 24, 274 
protesters were arrested and detained by police during an evening protest and 
street march. Two days later during another evening march, some students were 
shot point-blank in the face by Quebec City police with tear gas canisters.

The police actions in Quebec should concern every Canadian and they raise the 
obvious spectre of the cruel, war policies in Ukraine coming home to roost in 
Canada. And in an eerie replication of the pattern of mainstream news reporting 
of Ukraine, the news of police actions in Quebec has largely gone unreported 
elsewhere in the country.

Illegal war in the Middle East

Another taste of the new, Ukraine-inspired law and order in Canada is the 
federal government's decision to extend to Syria the aerial bombing campaign it 
has been conducting in Iraq alongside its U.S. big brother. The bombings are 
purportedly targeting "terrorists". On what legal basis is Canada going to war 
in Syrian territory? Roughly the same as in Iraq, namely, 'the U.S. is doing 
it, so we should join them'.

Harper told Parliament that Canada is "pursuing this action on exactly the same 
legal basis as its allies". But he did not answer what, exactly, is that basis.

Foreign affairs minister Rob Nicholson told the chamber, "The Americans have 
operated in there [Syria] for six months without resistance from the Syrian 
government."

Minister of Defense Jason Kenny says Canada is acting at the behest of the 
discredited and U.S. puppet government in Iraq. He said, "Iraq has asked Canada 
and allied countries to help them defend their innocent civilians from terror 
attacks being launched out of eastern Syria in a part of that country the 
Syrian government either is unwilling or unable to control."

When pressed by opposition parties and journalists, the Conservatives agreed to 
send a letter to the United Nations to inform it of its plans.

The Liberals and the NDP agreed to the bombings in Iraq when they were launched 
six months ago but are uneasy over extending this to Syria. Both voted against 
the Syria adventure, though a section of the Liberals disagrees with party 
leader Justin Trudeau.

There is an atmosphere of intellectual intimidation prevailing in Canada 
whereby criticism of the war and of NATO is said to amount to uncritical 
support of the Russian government (or what Stephen Harper calls "Putin's 
regime"). As a consequence, some alternative media that should know better is 
silent. Academia and antiwar groups are largely quiescent. In Quebec, the 
radical publication Presse-toi à gauche routinely publishes the 'blame Russia' 
outlook, describing the people of eastern Ukraine as hapless victims of Russian 
aggression to be pitied. In 2003, the advocates of war against Iraq did not get 
very far with accusations against antiwar forces of "appeasing" Iraqi ruler 
Saddam Hussein. Today, a parallel argument against Russia has been effective in 
quieting voices that would otherwise be expected to be critical.

The NATO confrontation with Russia is a reckless and dangerous course that is 
corroding politics in Canada. It threatens the capacity to forge a progressive 
alternative to the governing warmakers if it is not challenged. That's why it 
is important to speak and act against the war in Ukraine and its wider 
implications.

Roger Annis is an editor of the website  <http://newcoldwar.org/> The New Cold 
War: Ukraine and beyond. He can be reached at  <mailto:rogeran...@hotmail.com> 
rogeran...@hotmail.com. This article appeared in Counterpunch and in Rabble.ca 
on March 31, 2015.

Notes:
[1] The full story of the sniper massacres on Maidan Square is documented by 
Ivan Katchanovski 
<http://newcoldwar.org/the-snipers-massacre-on-the-maidan-in-ukraine-revised-and-updated-version/>
 , a researcher at the University of Ottawa. 

  _____  

Source URL (retrieved on 04/02/2015 - 17:32): 
http://russia-insider.com/en/canadas-political-mainstream-backs-war-ukraine-threats-against-russia/5215

 

Reply via email to