Maxim, Yes, that is a good point, at least it can save the memory management module in the ser core. Not sure how is performance of libc compare to SER's own one.. probably also depends on the libc optimization on a particular target platform. -William
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William, > > I think you may get further run-time footprint reduction by using system > memory allocator instead of the custom one (comment out F_MALLOC and > PKG_MALLOC). If it's embedded distro it might have allocator that is > specifically designed to conserve memory and you will definitely save on the > management overhead. Also it might shave off some code from SER's core, as > you won't need the code that duplicates what you already have in libc. > > > William Zhang wrote: > > > Finally I got some time to put everything together to produce the > > small footprint SER based on SER 0.9.6 for embedded system. Thanks a > > lot to Andrei for providing very useful suggestion. Here is the list > > of my changes: > > > > 1. Reduce code size > > > > Regards, > -- > Maksym Sobolyev > Sippy Software, Inc. > Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts > T/F: +1-646-651-1110 > Web: http://www.sippysoft.com > _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
