On Jun 25, 2008 at 10:04, Jan Janak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: > > On Jun 24, 2008 at 18:13, Jan Janak (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [ http://tracker.iptel.org/browse/SER-266?page=all ] > >> > >> Jan Janak resolved SER-266. > >> --------------------------- > >> > >> Resolution: Fixed > > > > > > IIRC this was not a bug on ser side, rather a creative ser tm function > > use in openims (there was some discussion on serdev long time ago, see > > http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2007-June/010312.html). > > But this change does not harm, does it? So there is no reason why we > should not have it in the cvs, right?
Useless 2 line assignement :-) I agree, there's no harm. Andrei _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
