[ http://tracker.iptel.org/browse/SER-208?page=all ]
Jan Janak updated SER-208:
--------------------------
Fix Version/s: Ipteldorf
(was: Wishlist)
> Use of save_noreply() in reply_route block.
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SER-208
> URL: http://tracker.iptel.org/browse/SER-208
> Project: SER
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Registrar
> Affects Versions: Ipteldorf
> Reporter: Atle Samuelsen
> Fix For: Ipteldorf
>
>
> Use of save_noreply() in reply_route block.
> It would be nice to have a feature where you could use save_noreply() in a
> reply_route block. This to update a local location database for users, so
> that a main proxy would not need to know the whole path out to a user.
> scenario:
> proxy A (main proxy) Proxy B (Edge proxy)
> UA
> <- REgister <-register
> <-register
> 401 -> ->401
> ->401
> <-register w/challange <-register w/challange
> <-register w/challange
>
> ^Trigger onreply_route
> <200 OK -> 200 OK ->
> <-200 OK
>
> ^ Troggers save_noreply in onreply_route.
> - Atle
> ps: hopefully my "drawing" looks good after I post this
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://tracker.iptel.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
