Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
>> It causes that nonce from previous ser instance is always considered as
>> stalled even it's not necessary in case when secrets are not generated,
>> i.e. remain the same. I don't think it worth testing memcmp first and
>> only if differs test since<up_since. I think it's marginal case and
>> extra stale response is not problem. Do you agree?
>
> I agree.
>> If yes I'll commit it.
>
> Please don't commit it, I already have the exact same code in my base64
> version which is waiting for Jan's blessing before commit. If you commit
> it, I'll run into merge conflicts :-(
Go ahead.
Jan.
_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
