Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: > On Nov 04, 2008 at 15:22, Ondrej Martinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The second logging API won't help at all - few will actually use it and >> even fewer will modify the old code - and it's not a good idea anyway. >> >> Also I think it's a good opportunity to apply this kind of changes right >> now when SER is being merged with OpenSER. >> > > No, I think this is the worst point. If we are going to change something > that touches so much code, we will have to do it after the merge (I > don't want to make it even more complex). > I agree with Ondrej - there is no 'do-it-gradually-and-nice' way around it: 1/this part should really be fixed (with arguments as both user and devel.) , 2/newest logging macros are not always used with new code, right now, after so much time of 'accommodation'. I don't know if it is a good moment or not, but, if not mistaken, OpenSER had this fixed quite some time ago; so, it will have to be considered somehow, anyway. At best, with merging, a/the better solution will be applied to this part, as well.
Regards, -- Bogdan Pintea IPTEGO GmbH http://www.iptego.com _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
