Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Personally, if the change was to be made, I would prefer > something like... > > I understand why, but it would require a change to the data > model we expose > via the Mailet API. The current API supports neither child > elements nor > attributes. The proposed change is compatible with the > current data model.
Fair point! Still, I would retain <maxRetrys> tag and use the last of the <delayTime> tags as the time to use where maxRetrys > number of delayTime tags. As I am unsure that same named tags are returned in the sequence they are entered, I might enforce successively longer delay times and define 'last' as the longest. -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
