On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:08, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Steve, > > > Merlin doesn't have support for JMX and one of the goals on the > > James roadmap is to improve monitoring / management via JMX. > > Quite correct. However, today James does use better logging than Merlin > supports, and does not use JMX. Today. So the logging is the primary > blocking factor, because we'd have to give something up to use Merlin. > > JMX is on the work list for Merlin. Perhaps Stephen would use James as a > test bed when implementing JMX. That could lead towards a community effort > to do some very nice JMX within Merlin and James.
Ok so what is the next move? Should we wait for Merlin 3.1 featuring JMX & extended logging? (BTW I could help Steve on this task to boost the release cycle) Or could we start thinking about a common user base? How about something like a cornerstone user manager? see http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08037.html also (mostly based on authentification) http://sourceforge.net/projects/aaa4avalon/ Regards --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
