Stefano, +1
Looks like a good plan that takes the ForrestBot idea, builds on it, integrates other things, seems secure and scalable, provides the opportunity for "anyone" to help write documentation, but provides multiple points oversight. The proposed workflow institutionalizes RTC, but the project can always revert a change if others disagree with the decision to approve the change. I do think that we want to try to enure that we have sufficient security in the system to prevent someone from making an unwanted change and then spoofing an approval. Perhaps we could require SMTP AUTH over SSL for the moderators? --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]