----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas G�ggerle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'James Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:27 PM Subject: RE: [PATCH] RemoteDelivery multiple delay times
> But why do I need to extend the MimeMessage class? As far as I can see, > it does nothing new. That's because of getting rid off all the unwanted default-headers MimeMessage generates in writeTo(...). Use your original MimeMessage instead you will see what i mean. You will also get an error message. But keep in mind with this writeTo version no auto-encoding is done, so you are responsible for RFC-compliance. As for that matter take a look at MimeUtiltity.encode(...). This is only necessary when you have non ascii characters in your text like "Umlaute". If you dont know your encoding scheme use MimeUtility.getEncoding(DataHandler dh). M --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
