Hmm. I suppose this was what I was getting at. But.... Qmail and Sendmail both have facilities to setup SMTP routes to deliver to alternate ports and this can't be done using DNS trickery. However, I think a few matcher/mailet tricks will do what I want, so I'll leave it for now.
-- Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 November 2003 20:43 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: SMTP routes > > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >>I rather dislike this overloading approach to mailet > configuration. I > >>think you'll soon end up with another Redirect mailet that few > >>understand and is trying to be another Swiss army knife. > > > > Well, I hope not, but on the other hand, we did clean up > the Redirect > > area, and it does provide neccessary capabilities. > > > > Another alternative would be enhancing the DNSServer code > so that it > > could be given locally authoritative mappings. That is > closer to the > > semantic we want, since we ask the DNS server to map a domain to an > > SMTP server. > > Oooh, I do like that better since it does seem like the right > semantic. > Good idea. > > -- > Serge Knystautas > President > Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> > http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
