Danny Angus wrote: > > > <...> about Sub version? :-) Want to be the first James > <.....>? We > are going to have to start migrating to it, anyway, soon enough. > > No. That should be a PMC decision, and I think we do it > once-for-all, when > we're asked/invited to not before and not piecemeal. > Moving to subversion is potentially a substantially > disruptive step and > while I would welcome the benefit I don't think we should be > rushing into > it. > Splitting the project across two different versioning systems > offers more > disadvatages than advantages.
In relation to James I agree. In relation to Sieve I don't. If Sieve will eventually have to be moved to subversion and the subversion support is in place, it may as well start out there. As it will be a new, independent, module it will have no impact on when and how James transitions to subversion, save for the fact that I may learn a few things which may help James later. -- Steve D. Not sure this will make it through your filter :-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
