> > This is something that I already developed last fall at the sender
> > MTA side ("AddServerSignature" mailet)
>
> You and I discussed it in September, at the latest. There should be a
> record of it in our archives, and I have a copy of the server-signed message
> you sent to me with the source code on September 16th.
>
No problem, I have all the source code working.
> > but stopped because I was counting on having a MUA check at the recipient
> > side, and Outlook Express was not behaving correctly.
>
> Do you recall what the issue was? I would expect to have to rewrite the
> Sender: header to match the key.
>
> The threads were "From email address validation" and "[PROPOSAL] Release
> Plan" in this list.
>
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=9935
The "Sender:" header is already ok, the problem is that Outlook Express seems to be
not behaving well: Outlook Express [considers] as a tampering the fact of having
the signature not coming from the sender, and ignores the "Sender:" header.
At that time I sent a "probe" (see http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&msgNo=9937) to understand which MUA-s were well behaved, but only Serge and
Matthew Pangaro did reply.
Now, should we ignore the Outlook Express behaviour and proceed? Or should we look for
a signature being checked at the recipient server side? ... Just to see if there are
thoughts about this.
> > Any thoughts?
>
> Time to get this into CVS so that it is an option. :-)
:-))
Vincenzo
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
