There are is reference to an email in the first (and also in the last) sentence of the description, that email includes both the fix and the analysis, which may answer your question.
"Related email thread: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=11183" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 1:33 AM Subject: RE: Test Build posted - JAMES-264 mail loop > > If someone would try to use the email list mailets with non-local users > then > > he will very soon change his mind because of the catastrophic "JAMES-264 > > UNRESOLVED mail list loop caused by using Return-Path" bug. > > I use the listserv without any such catastrophic problems, or any loops at > all. Curious as to how you are handling bounces that you do. > > > In the description of the issue I included a quick fix, which consists of > > about 5 lines. > > There is no such fix in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-264. I > do have a separate patch you wrote for GenericListserv, which I'm looking at > now. > > > If this issue will be closed maybe a new one with lower priority should be > > opened, because the root of the problem, the usage of Return-Path header > > will still be in the code, the fix is just a workaround for a specific > > problem. > > That is what I've been looking at today. It is a riskier change to make on > a point release, but might be worthwhile. > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
