> -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 April 2005 17:23 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: Merging (was [VOTE] POJO pattern) > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >>the merging process, which took almost 2 years (until now) > > > > Actually, not even one. And that only because I got *really* busy, and > was > > told that I should commit it finished rather than as a work-in-progress, > > which meant that no one else was contributing to it. > > To be fair, Noel was doing yeoman's work for James in 2003 and 2004. > Here we are in Sept 2003 already calling MAIN dead and giving Noel flack > for not maintaining two branches... > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=james-dev&m=106392166516868&w=2 > > >>There is nothing to lose, we don't use anything from the > >>head anyway. > > > > That is entirely wrong, as noted above. And part of the issue with the > > merger is making sure I don't lose any of those important parts. Plus > the > > crazy schedule I've been keeping since last June. > > I saw the point was more that we would not lose anything (since > everything is in SVN) if we dumped what we have in MAIN (now trunk) and > replaced it with branch_2_1_fcs. And, since we're agreeing on an > evolutionary move away from our current dependencies, we could replace > trunk with what's in branch_2_1_fcs to: > - have code releases come off of trunk (simpler), and > - only one branch to maintain (more efficient)
As far as the IMAP work goes, the bits I've done already and that form the basis of the IMAP implementation can be merged into any source tree. This includes user attributes and my initial work on the new repositories. The protocol stack will take some hack-n-slash to get it going, but once the new way is clear I will start work again (I hope). If somebody does the POP3 server then the IMAP stuff will follow naturally as they are fairly similar in layout terms. IMAP's just a little more complex :) > > > Blame me if you want. Enough validity in that, I suppose. I recently > > installed a VM on my laptop to carry around a JAMES build environment, > so > > that I can work when I catch time, and plan to start committing the > merger > > in parts, rather than as a whole, so that others can help out. > > As tempting as it is, you have done way too much to deserve blame. > > Now that we are building consensus and direction, I'd like to simplify > our path to move us forward. While it is painful to just kill a branch, > unless you suddenly become unemployed (or we massively and unfairly > guilt-trip you into skipping work for a week), I see it as the simplest > course of action. > > -- > Serge Knystautas > Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com > p. 301.656.5501 > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
