In that case definitely use the IMAP2 proposal as it has a set of JUnit tests to test the protocol.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 April 2005 16:53 > To: James Developers List > Subject: RE: Mina SMTP implementation updates > > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 09:42 +0100, Jason Webb wrote: > > IMHO I'd leave IMAP alone unless you really, really want IMAP. > > NNTP might be a better option as the IMAP code does not persist anything > to > > a permanent store so it's useless for most people at the moment. > > However if you just want the protocol stack then use the IMAP2 proposal. > > I just want the protocol stack. My SMTP code right now just dumps the > received message to the console. Permanent stores are not an issue > yet. :) > > -Mike > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
