[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-358?page=comments#action_12312566 ]
Noel J. Bergman commented on JAMES-358: --------------------------------------- I disagree with this patch, and feel that it has gone in the wrong direction, particularly in light of the RFC's clear intent. The correct solution is to detect the permanent failure and abort the delivery. Please look at implementing that patch, instead. :-) > Too many RemoteDelivery attempts with many mx and many ip > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JAMES-358 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-358 > Project: James > Type: Bug > Components: Remote Delivery > Versions: 2.2.0 > Reporter: Stefano Bagnara > Priority: Minor > Attachments: DNSServer.java.singleIPperMX.diff, > james-config.xml.singleIPperMX.diff > > Take a domain with 5 mx servers each one with 6 associated ips. James > currently try to connect to each MX server even if the first server say > "5.1.1 user unknown", but even worst, james try to connect to each IP of each > MX server. > I think that james should only check each MX server once, at a random IP > address from the IP list for that mx hostname. > The permanent user error issue would be only a further optimization but the > IP issue is probably against the RFC specifications. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
