> I don't see too much benefits in removing jdk1.3 support but > indeed if we try to mantain jdk1.3 compliance we should also > publicize it (currently james sites says james needs jdk1.4). > > Any other benefits removing jdk1.3 support?
Well, looking better: BC compatibility jars are 2MB. So removing jdk1.3 compatibility would mean a 1.5MB james.sar instead of the current 3.5MB. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
