> IMHO this is a good improvement over the current API way to resolve local > users (double call) and this would allow us to implement automatic > virtualhosting support.
I agree. :-) > In solution 2) and 3) I would also deprecate the current isLocalUser since > it does not make much sense to check wether an user is local without > checking the domain first. Also agree. > My vote goes for "1a)" if we plan to add this in 2.3.0 because it would be > totally backward compatible but for "2)" if we delay this change to 3.0. Agree. +1 to 1a (p.s. to the person who wanted a "default" domain, names without addresses are legitimate email addresses, the RFC's say that they should be treated as destined for the local domain, this translates literally to "localhost", but I guess could be made to be configurable to any domain) > IMHO implementation details can be discussed after this one. Agree. I agree with your approach to enabling virtual hosting in SMTP by delegating more of the domain/destination decisions to the mailets. The only concern that I have is related to matching this up with POP3 changes. Any change that doesn't impose a naming convention and is backwards compatible is OK by me. d. *************************************************************************** The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately on 0141 306 2050 and delete the message from your computer. You may not copy or forward it or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption Student Loans Company Limited does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. For this reason it may be inappropriate to rely on advice or opinions contained in an e-mail without obtaining written confirmation of it. Neither Student Loans Company Limited or the sender accepts any liability or responsibility for viruses as it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of The Student Loans Company Limit ed. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ************************************************************************** --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
