The main reason for adding the features in the handler was that otherwise we have some more handlers to maintain and maybe some duplicate code. So i see no problems with that.. The features are all disabled when no configure value is set. So running installations should not have any comments.
But if it should seperate to a diffrent handler per feature i can make that too.. bye Am Freitag, den 07.04.2006, 10:43 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: > The intent -- at least from some of us -- for the handler chain was not to > keep adding features into core handlers, but to add additional handlers. So > far, I keep seeing more optional features added to core handlers. > > Comments? > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,44367a9c37029291013462!
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
