I will add this improvment to james as fast as i can.. But i think we should add this config value do james core and not the smtphandler chain cause otherwise it whould be in the mail handler (thats a bit confusing).. What you think ?
bye Am Donnerstag, den 13.04.2006, 19:36 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Imho it would be a good thing because we introduce a configuration to > stay backward compatibility with older James. > > James < 2.3.0 was not enforcing HELO and someone could rely on this. > > At least we can give them an option. > > Stefano > > Norman Maurer wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > what you think about to make i configurable to use the helo > > enforcement ? Maybe some guys not want to have it always enabled.. Or is > > this not intressting to us cause its needed by RFC. > > > > bye > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,443e8c9837021763695013!
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
