> If I understood the new code depends on the DNSServer interface, isn't
> it? I don't think we should use org.apache.spf if the code depends on
> org.apache.james.services.DNSServer and on the implementation
< (org.apache.james.dnsserver.DNSServer).
No, no. It should NOT depend upon our DNS server interface, IMO. It should
depend on DNSJava, which is the same underlying code that our "DNS Server"
service uses.
> Furthermore, where do we want to put the SPF functionality? What will
> the SPF "contract" (interface) be to James?
That contract is what I would put into org.apache.james.util.mail.spf or
whatever named package.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
