Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> I just don't like the current cmdhandler to be an "user" feature. So I'd
> like to hide it to the standard user.
There are a lot of ways that a "standard user" can cause problems. I'd just
document this as an area to change with extreme caution, and also document
the current code as internal-use only, subject to change. We'll have warned
them, and have no obligation to preserve the API.
> Furthermore, as I don't like the way current handlers works, I will try
> to propose something different (or something built on top of them) for
> future James releases, and I would not like to be bound to backward
> compatibility for this issue.
Agreed. I still want to go back to handler packages, for example. My
earlier proposal allowed much easier configuration, while still allowing the
standard configuration to be overridden if someone had a need.
But this may mean that we don't have a stable handler API until 2.5 or
later, since I believe that we'll want to get 2.4 out sooner.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
