Am Samstag, den 27.05.2006, 12:56 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Serge, > > > >> The term "subproject" is something of a loaded term at Apache > > > > Thanks for posting this. I'd started and stopped the same e-mail about > > three times. Primarily, because I want to doublecheck to make sure that the > > IP for jSPF and then Postage is handled properly. We should file IP > > Clearance forms for each of them. > > I already tried to explain the exact path we followed writing jSPF and > the third party code involved. > I don't have enough knowledge of the IP and copyright notices law and I > hoped you could help with this. > > We started from spfjava submitted "with grants for inclusion" by the > author (Roger Fullertone). > > We rewrote from scratch the whole parsing and the whole "business" > processing algorythm. The only code we now have from spfjava (to be > confirmed by Norman) are a few utilities and costant classes and the > "MacroExpansion" code. I don't know how much we did change that.
You are right the only think we keep are a few methods in IPAddr, and the MacroExpand class ( we also change stuff there(. > > We furthermore added unittests based on tests definition files (txt) > found at http://www.schlitt.net/spf/tests/tests_v2.1/test.txt (I wrote > this to the pmc list 20 days ago ;-) ). > We then added this tasks to JIRA to track this issues: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-5 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-12 > > Norman, talking to an SPF developer in IRC found out that the tests were > also distributed as part of libspf2 (http://www.libspf2.org/), licensed > under the "LGPL or 2-clause BSD". > > jSPF currently depends on dnsjava and log4j for the core library and > junit for the unit tests. > > We would really be happy if you can help with this issues. > > Furthermore we are ready for an 1.0b1 release. Norman closed one of the > few blocking issues for 1.0 (the website) today. I hope you can help > with the release steps, too! Im not close it ;-) There are still a few things todo. I whould like to copy the contributor page content of james. Any problems with that ? > > SPF specifications we implement are described here: > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4408.txt > > >> For me, the most important issue is that we have only one > >> committer base across all these. i.e., we're not going to > >> add someone exclusively to mime4j or postage. > > > > +1 > > +1 > > Stefano > +1 Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
