Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
My patch should has nothing to do with db repositories. So I think
this doesn't matter.
[...]
that's the whole point of comparing file-repo with non-file-repo under
the same conditions and the result is: db-repo has similar
problems/symptoms. (and that's why it matters to repeat the tests with
db repos.)
Just to avoid misunderstandings my "it doesn't matter" was a reply to
Norman's "Before applied the patch of Stefano or after ?".
I completely agree with your analysis: we should close JAMES-512 and
eventually open a new bug with more information about the probable bug
you are describing now.
Imho it should be tested with more memory before opening a new bug. If
it is a leak it will happen even with Xmx set to 256 or 512MB, otherwise
maybe it is simply a requirement (maybe related to a bad usage of
memory, but if so it is less critical).
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
