+1 for update bye Norman
Am Donnerstag, den 06.07.2006, 17:51 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > >> Stefano Bagnara wrote: > >>> I think we should update derby both in trunk and branch, test it works, > >>> and we are ready for the 2.3.0b2 vote. > > > >> Built, signed and upload in process to > > http://people.apache.org/~noel/james > > > > Done. > > > > --- Noel > > I'm ready to update our site repository with introducing the new docs > from trunk. > > I changed the "documentation" menu to include this items: > > James 2.1-2.2 (Old James 2.X) > Design 2.1-2.2 (Old Design) > James 2.3 > Design 2.3 > > I think that for a while we should keep both because: > - many people we'll look for 2.2 even after 2.3 release > - search engines have 2.2 items indexed > - 2.3 docs are not completed yet, but they are better than nothing. > > Should I commit it to the site repository and update the minotaur checkout? > > Stefano > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,44ad320648531916010323!
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
