Am Donnerstag, den 13.07.2006, 14:17 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: > > Ok i finished my "reorganize" of the packages and classes. > > I don't know that you took out the configuration of the pre and post > handlers. The configuration should be soft. Those are only two lines, and > should be put back in. We can always detect if we are missing something, > and log a message or even default to throwing an exception.
Im not sure about this.. I have no problems to put them back, but i think the hardcoded version give us more control that the admin not break the "RFC".. Anyway i will put them back in config if that makes you happier. > > Also, the core handler package can implement both MessageHandler and > CommandsHandler so that you can eliminate the explicit SendMailHandler > config. > > --- Noel > Im not sure i understand you right... You think we should also load the SendMailHandler in the CoreCmdHandlerLoader ? If that was what you mean i don't agree.. Cause this handler must be calles after the other MessageHandler (which the admin maybe configure). We could only force it to be loaded as the last MessageHandler.. bye Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
