> > Norman Maurer wrote: > > we developed a java implementation for spf called jSPF. Version 0.9b1 > > wil be released next week if nothing goes wrong.. Now someone open a bug > > report which report us that microsoft.com return a permError cause the > > maximum includes of 10 is to less.. But i think the bugreport is invalid > > cause the specs are really clear on this.. > > You are absolutely correct, the microsoft.com records are invalid -- hard > to believe but true. And I think it is important that implementations and > their users NOT begin to weaken their lookup limits, because otherwise > more and more domains will begin to ignore the lookup limits, in turn > again causing other implementations to have to raise, or entirely get rid > of, their limits.
I fully agree.. if is in RFC we should not "break" it. > > The limits are a necessary evil that serve the purpose of mitigating the > risks of DoS attacks. > Thx for the reply.. i just wanted to get sure :-) Thx Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
