> I don't know if "RoamingUsers" is better or worst than "PopBeforeSmtp":
> what do ther thinks?
There are many ways to handle RoamingUsers. POPBeforeSMTP is at least
descriptive.
> 2) Before 3.0 I would like to find a better solution than hardcoding the
> check in PassCmdHandler (maybe support the new fastfail in pop3, and add
> support for filters after command execution for this).
Well, I agree and disagree. I disagree in that these are not really filters;
they are command handlers. In some cases, the commands filter, but they are
structurally indentical. And I agree that we should rebuild the protocol
handlers in the same manner as we rebuilt SMTP (and which IMAP, conceptually,
used earlier), using pluggable command handlers.
> 3) We start having a little mess with authorized users, relaying
> allowed, authorized networks and how handlers manage this. Let's
> keep in mind this and maybe we'll find a clean solution to this.
I don't disagree. What if anything do you have in mind at this time?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
