Norman Maurer wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 30.07.2006, 12:08 +0200 schrieb Vincenzo Gianferrari
Pini:
*If* I understood well the problem, but it's Noel the one who discovered
and digged into it, and is much more entitled to say if it would work.
To be precise, I think that the best, easiest and cleanest thing would
be to change the stock james-smtphandlerchain.xml file this way:
<whitelist> query.bondedsender.org </whitelist>
<blacklist> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org </blacklist>
<blacklist> list.dsbl.org </blacklist>
<blacklist> dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net </blacklist>
<blacklist> relays.ordb.org </blacklist>
to become
<whitelist> query.bondedsender.org. </whitelist>
<blacklist> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. </blacklist>
<blacklist> list.dsbl.org. </blacklist>
<blacklist> dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net. </blacklist>
<blacklist> relays.ordb.org. </blacklist>
The important entry is to the whitelist, but I would put it in all
domain names for coherence, and explain/warn the problem in a comment line.
Vincenzo
Well, maybe we should check if the "entry" contains a "." as last char.
if not add it. What the others think ?
IMO it would be cleaner to rely only on the config and to not change the
code, as an administrator could want to use names relative to his own
domain when defining private whitelists and blacklists. But it may be
just an aesthetical point of view from my part :-) .
Vincenzo
bye
Norman
Ps: We should change the config of course to show the correct
"configuration".
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
