On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 13:06 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Mike Heath wrote: > > HausMail is ASLv2.0. It is not LGPL. Never has been. > > I think the misleading info is there: > http://hausmail.safehaus.org/Licenses
This page has been fixed. Thanks for pointing the problem out to me. <snip> > I don't think that it will be good for MINA to have protocol handling > subprojects, btw If the directory PMC decided this way then I agree with > you and I think that your SMTP implementation should be contributed to MINA. > > We could not accept it now because of the java 5 dependency and maybe it > is now much more different from our new smtp handler architecture. I > remember we had a similar pattern 1 year ago, but then we both evolved > in different ways. > > Either way if it will be part of MINA we could anyway borrow code/class > from you and I hope that you can help us if we'll need suggestions on > MINA/SMTP as you have that knowledge. > > What are the timings for this MINA move? I agree that with MINA part of the Directory project, adding protocol handlers doesn't make a lot of sense. MINA is working towards becoming a TLP. When MINA becomes a TLP, it makes a lot of sense for the project to host implementations of as many protocols as they can. Having pre-built stable implementations of protocols adds a great deal of value to the MINA project. As far as timing goes, I'm not sure. I've got some personal issues I need to work out so that I can devote the appropriate amount of time to this. There still needs to be some coordination with the MINA project as well. -Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
