Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I won't have time to test this before tomorrow night at the earliest, so
if
> > someone has time to run a bench test and look for memory leaks, that
would
> > be great. With the latest code, I'm seeing my OS reported memory
increasing
> > fairly steadily with no plateau so far.
> The OS return what the JVM uses. And the JVM in the long term tend to
> use all of the memory in the Xmx if this helps perfomance. I *always*
> see my java applications (james, tomcat, jetty, weblogic) growing fairly
> steadily until they reach the Xmx and start running *full* gc.
JAMES r428561:
STARTED Thu Aug 3 20:05:25 EDT 2006
STOPPED Sat Aug 5 17:50:40 EDT 2006
The JVM allocation grew from ~50MB to >145MB without leveling off.
The good news is JAMES r429063:
STARTED Phoenix Sat Aug 5 17:51:40 EDT 2006
and is still runnning. It was 112MB this morning, and is 113MB now. I'll
keep an eye on it, but that is the kind of leveling off that I did not see
with the prior version. As I had said,
> > I am not saying that there is a memory leak; just that I would like to
see
> > memory use level off, and it hasn't so far
I ran `svn diff -r 428561:429063` within branches/v2.3/src/java, and saw
that you committed more of the dispose() changes in that revision period, so
at the moment, I'm feeling better about the situation.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
