On 8/24/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> You say "New approach to spooling". How does the proposal affect
> spooling 'in general'?
>
> How is this related to past propositions (IIRC) to evolve RD from a
> mailet to something better, e.g. an own processor?
Maybe you're referring to my proposal to create a RemoteDeliveryManager
that, like the JamesSpoolManager, is a top level component and has its
own mailet pipeline.
Exactly.
I already use this approach in one of my production machine and I
planned to adapt it to the current trunk but Noel started the other
thread to plan a different behaviour as soon as I started talking about
this one, so I waited to understand what he was planning to do.
I also have a lot of things in my todo list, so I at least try to review
the proposal and try to understand where it is better or worst of what I
already use.
well, I think we should eventually merge (the best of) both approaches
if they are addressing the same thing.
its not about either one being better or worse.
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
