Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>> I think that this change is safe as James Server already have a default
>>> hardcoded configuration for the smtp handlerchain
>> Do we need for them to match?
> I don't see any advantage in overriding the default configuration with
> the same identical configuration, but maybe I'm missing something...
No, those were two unrelated comments. One was a question asking you if we
need for the two to match, and you've not only said no, but provided a good
reason why we want to remove it:
> if we don't override the default in postage right now it
> works fine with both james 2.3.0 or james trunk.
Separately:
> > Personally, I doubt that most people will use the default
> > configuration unless we make it more like a real production
> > configuration.
> Well, at least with 2.3.0 most people should use the default as we
> marked the handlerchain experimental and disabled by default.
Not if they want fast-fail, which is a major part of the v2.3.0 release,
even if the configuration WILL change.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
